Skip to content
Login - Changemaker-lite Docs

# Indigenous Nations Stand Against UCP Authoritarianism

## Treaty Rights Under Attack Through Bill 54's Separation Referendum Provisions

The voices of Indigenous Nations across Alberta have been clear and unified: Bill 54 represents a direct threat to Treaty rights and Indigenous sovereignty. From the Confederacy of Treaty 6 First Nations to Cold Lake First Nations, Indigenous leaders are sounding the alarm about the UCP's dangerous agenda.

## Treaty Rights Are Not Negotiable

### The Indigenous Response

As Chief Kelsey Jacko of Cold Lake First Nations declared: "Our treaty is not negotiable; it never was and never will be."

This statement cuts to the heart of why Bill 54's referendum provisions are so dangerous. The legislation makes it easier to put separation questions on the ballot—but Treaties were signed with the Crown, not with individual provinces.

### What Treaties Protect

Indigenous Treaties in Alberta protect:

- Inherent sovereignty that predates and supersedes provincial authority
- Land rights that cannot be extinguished by provincial legislation
- Self-governance independent of provincial political whims
- Federal obligations that provinces cannot override
- Cultural and spiritual practices protected by constitutional law

### The Threat of Separation

Bill 54's lowered threshold for citizen-initiated referendums creates a pathway for separation questions that could:

- Undermine federal Treaty obligations by weakening the Crown's capacity to fulfill commitments
- Create legal uncertainty about Treaty enforcement in a separated Alberta
- Expose Indigenous Nations to even more aggressive provincial interference
- Violate the principle that Treaties cannot be altered without Indigenous consent

## The Broader Pattern of UCP Authoritarianism

### Historical Context

Indigenous peoples in Alberta have experience with authoritarian governments that:

- Imposed residential schools to destroy Indigenous cultures
- Passed laws restricting Indigenous movement and governance
- Seized Indigenous lands without consent
- Used legislation to undermine Treaty rights

The UCP's current approach echoes these historical patterns of colonial control.

### Current Attacks

Beyond Bill 54, the UCP has:

- Ignored Indigenous consultation on resource projects
- Undermined Indigenous education funding and programming
- Attacked Indigenous environmental activism through anti-protest legislation
- Failed to implement calls to action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

## Democratic Solidarity

### Standing Together

The Indigenous opposition to Bill 54 provides crucial leadership for all Albertans concerned about democracy. Indigenous Nations understand that:

- Treaty rights protect not just Indigenous peoples but set important limits on government power
- Indigenous sovereignty offers a model for community self-determination
- Collective resistance to authoritarianism benefits everyone
- Constitutional rights must be defended through unified action

### Learning from Indigenous Leadership

Non-Indigenous Albertans can learn from Indigenous approaches to defending rights:

Long-term thinking: Indigenous Nations plan for seven generations, not just election cycles Collective action: Indigenous politics emphasizes community consensus and collective wellbeing Principled resistance: Indigenous movements maintain clear values even under pressure Constitutional awareness: Indigenous leaders understand the legal foundations of rights protection

## The UCP's Dangerous Game

### Playing with Separation

The UCP's flirtation with separation rhetoric serves multiple authoritarian purposes:

- Distracts from failures in healthcare, education, and economic management
- Mobilizes their base around grievance politics rather than policy solutions
- Creates crisis that can justify extraordinary measures
- Undermines federal institutions that provide checks on provincial power

### Threatening Indigenous Nations

For Indigenous Nations, separation talk represents:

- Existential threat to Treaty relationships with the federal Crown
- Legal uncertainty about the status of Treaties in a separated Alberta
- Potential exposure to even more aggressive provincial control
- Violation of the principle that Treaties cannot be altered without consent

## Building Alliances

### Indigenous-Settler Solidarity

The fight against Bill 54 requires authentic alliances between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Albertans based on:

Mutual respect for Indigenous sovereignty and Treaty rights

Shared opposition to authoritarianism and corporate control

Common interest in democratic institutions that serve communities

Recognition that Indigenous rights strengthen everyone's rights

### Supporting Indigenous Leadership

Non-Indigenous allies can support Indigenous-led resistance by:

- Amplifying Indigenous voices rather than speaking for Indigenous communities
- Learning about Treaty history and Indigenous legal traditions
- Supporting Indigenous organizations financially and politically
- Challenging colonial attitudes in their own communities
- Following Indigenous leadership on issues affecting Indigenous rights

## The Path Forward

### Legal Strategies

Indigenous Nations have unique legal tools to challenge Bill 54:

- Treaty rights that supersede provincial legislation
- Constitutional protection under Section 35
- Fiduciary relationship with the federal Crown
- International law protecting Indigenous rights

### Political Mobilization

Indigenous political organization provides a model for broader resistance:

- Grassroots organizing rooted in community relationships
- Clear principles that don't compromise on fundamental rights
- Coalition building across different Nations and communities
- Long-term strategy focused on systemic change

### Building Power

The Indigenous response to Bill 54 shows how to build real political power:

- Cultural grounding in values that can't be bought or sold
- Institutional knowledge of legal and political systems
- Community accountability that keeps leaders connected to their base
- Intergenerational perspective that prioritizes long-term sustainability

## Lessons for the Broader Movement

### What We Can Learn

The Indigenous opposition to Bill 54 teaches the broader democratic movement:

Rights are not gifts from government—they exist independently and must be defended Collective action is more powerful than individual resistance Legal strategy must be combined with political mobilization Long-term vision is essential for sustained resistance Cultural values provide the foundation for political action

### Building Solidarity

Effective solidarity with Indigenous Nations requires: - Respect for Indigenous sovereignty and leadership - Education about Treaty history and Indigenous law - Action supporting Indigenous-led initiatives - Accountability to Indigenous communities in our work

## Conclusion

The unified Indigenous opposition to Bill 54 represents some of the strongest leadership in the fight for democracy in Alberta. Indigenous Nations understand the stakes because they have the most experience with colonial authoritarianism.

Their clear stance—that Treaties are not negotiable and that separation threatens Indigenous sovereignty—provides a principled foundation for broader resistance to the UCP's anti-democratic agenda.

For non-Indigenous Albertans, supporting Indigenous leadership in this fight isn't just the right thing to do—it's strategically essential. Indigenous Nations have the legal tools, political experience, and moral authority to lead the challenge to Bill 54.

When Indigenous Nations lead the fight for rights and democracy, all Albertans benefit.

The question for non-Indigenous Albertans is simple: Will we follow Indigenous leadership in defending democracy, or will we allow the UCP to undermine the constitutional foundations that protect all our rights?

This analysis draws on public statements from Indigenous Nations across Alberta opposing Bill 54. For full documentation, see our archive.